Exhibited installation · Design with Data · 2026

LOOK DOWN

A physical-digital encounter with the life beneath our feet.

Starting from fieldwork at Salisbury Crags, we explored how underground microbial ecologies could be encountered through movement, material and digital interpretation.

The final installation combines a magnetic pendulum, a layered soil box and a circular interface. Rainfall sets a temporal rhythm; soil comparisons shape the conditions we chose to interpret.

Context
MA Design Informatics · University of Edinburgh
My role
Collaborative interaction & installation design
Period
January–April 2026
Team
Five collaborators
Final LOOK DOWN installation with an interpretation interface displayed on a tablet
Final installation / magnetic motion, exposed soil layers and digital interpretation
9
Locations compared
8
Soil variables
1
Focused mechanism

My contribution within the team

I contributed across several stages within our five-person team. The research, prototyping and making described below were developed collaboratively.

01 / Fieldwork & data

From visible rock to hidden soil ecologies.

We started with what was visible.

Our fieldwork at Salisbury Crags began with rock faces, paths, fencing and the visible landscape. Returning to our sketches made us notice how much our attention was shaped by scale and visibility.

The project then turned towards the soil beneath the site: an ecological world that was difficult to see, yet central to the landscape we were trying to understand.

Fenced access at Salisbury Crags during team fieldwork
Fieldwork / access, visibility and the limits of a first encounter
Four team field sketches exploring geological and ecological relationships
Returning to the field sketches helped us question our surface-led reading of the site.

Rainfall gives the work a rhythm.

We compared monthly rainfall across nine locations. Edinburgh’s recorded pattern became the temporal input for the installation, with monthly values ranging from 46 to 73 mm.

  1. 661
  2. 472
  3. 573
  4. 464
  5. 575
  6. 566
  7. 627
  8. 708
  9. 719
  10. 7310
  11. 6911
  12. 6312
Months 1–12 / monthly rainfall in mm
Rainfall data / report Appendix A

Soil gives it different conditions.

Eight soil variables helped us compare the selected locations. Rather than displaying every value at once, we explored how differences could inform motion, magnetic zones and an interpretive interface.

  • Nitrogen
  • Carbon
  • pH
  • C/N ratio
  • CEC
  • Base saturation
  • Bulk density
  • TEB

These comparisons informed a designed interpretation of soil ecology. The installation was not measuring microbial activity in real time.

Soil comparisons / report Appendix B

02 / Finding a focus

Make one relationship legible before representing the whole system.

  1. Layered underground model
  2. Suspended spheres
  3. Balancing scales
  4. Vertical hanging board
  5. Projected temporality
Early layered underground concept drawn by the team
Early direction / trying to represent the whole underground system
Team sketch of suspended forms responding to environmental variables
A shift towards movement, rhythm and relationships

The decision

One pendulum. A clearer relationship.

Our early directions held too many variables and symbolic elements at once. Feedback and prototyping helped us concentrate on one magnetic pendulum: a focused mechanism that could remain readable while responding to changing conditions.

Motion blur of the final suspended yarn form above the magnetic plate
Movement became the focal point of the encounter.

03 / Material & mechanism

Turning environmental data into a physical encounter.

A permanent magnet inside the suspended form interacts with magnets near the plate. A hidden rotating magnet, driven by an Arduino-controlled motor, changes the forces acting on the pendulum.

Recorded rainfall provides a repeating temporal cycle. The plate and digital interface provide a complementary way to interpret selected soil conditions.

The physical rhythm

  1. Monthly rainfall records
  2. Arduino + rotating magnet
  3. Changing magnetic forces
  4. Pendulum motion

The digital interface explained the installation; it was not a live controller of the pendulum.

Pendulum

Movement makes hidden relationships tangible.

A tactile yarn form represents microbial life. Its internal magnet responds to surrounding magnetic forces, turning changing conditions into oscillation and deflection.

The suspended yarn form above the installation
Pendulum / final installation

Magnetic plate

Invisible forces leave a visible trace.

Iron filings were chosen after exploring alternatives including ferrofluid and ink. Their patterns make magnetic relationships visible with manageable material and technical complexity.

Iron filings forming patterns on the magnetic plate
Magnetic plate / final installation

Soil box

A recognisable landscape grounds the abstraction.

A transparent acrylic box exposes layers of soil, stones, roots and collected materials. The base becomes an underground cross-section, connecting the mechanism to the ecology it represents.

Visible layers and roots in the final soil box
Soil box / final installation

Digital interface

An explanation alongside the physical experience.

The circular interface echoes the plate’s root-like regions. Molecules, ions and short explanations help visitors connect an abstract material encounter to selected soil processes.

Final circular interpretation interface with molecules and explanatory text
Digital interface / final installation
Early magnetic pendulum prototype used to compare magnet arrangements
Testing magnet arrangement before resolving the final form
3D-printed support with motor and rotating permanent magnet
A rotating permanent magnet sustains the motion without dominating the scene.

04 / Interface & experience

From fascination to understanding.

The interface became a visual translator.

Motion attracted attention, but its ecological meaning was not self-evident. The interface developed from a broad map-to-micro view towards a circular visual language aligned with the magnetic plate.

We used interface sketches to refine the connection between root-like regions, material patterns and short explanations. The final screen supported an interpretive encounter alongside the physical installation.

Final interpretation interface presented alongside the installation
Final interface / a shared visual language with the plate
Four early interface screens moving from a global map towards a circular soil view
Low-fidelity sequence / from the broad context to the soil
Hand-drawn interface sketch developing a root-like circular layout
Sketching the relationship between visual language and explanation
A tablet interpretation interface in front of the final soil installation
In the exhibition / the screen and installation needed a clearer spatial connection

05 / Exhibition & reflection

The exhibition made the next design questions clearer.

A question heard at the exhibition

So… how does it work?!

Anonymous visitor, recorded in the project portfolio

01

The screen felt disconnected.

Some visitors did not immediately connect a screen positioned away from the installation to the physical work.

Next iteration

Bring the screen and installation into one line of sight, with a clearer shared entry point.

02

The starting point was easy to miss.

The replay control was not prominent enough, so visitors could miss the explanatory narrative.

Next iteration

Reset the explanatory sequence for each encounter and make the first action unmistakable.

03

Exploration looked like live control.

Dragging visual elements suggested control of the physical pendulum, even though that connection had not been implemented.

Next iteration

Separate explanatory interaction from live actuation; test a direct link in a future iteration.

What I take forward

Working across several stages taught me to connect data choices, material experiments and audience interpretation. A compelling object still needs a clear invitation: what to notice, where to begin, and what an action actually changes.

The final installation was exhibited at InSpace in Edinburgh. Its observational feedback gives us concrete priorities for further development, rather than evidence of validated learning outcomes.

Exhibition / Designing Global Data Interactions

Project archive

Explore the evidence behind the case.

Team credits: Jiangzi Li · Millie Marriott Webb · Xiaoying Zhou · Xinran Fang · Xinyu Zhu

Project image

Open original image